An Official Journal of Polish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Background: The present study aims to assess the mid-term outcome in patients with diaphyseal humerus shaft fractures treated with minimally invasive anterior bridge plating versus conventional posterior plate.
Methodology: 60 consecutive patients with closed diaphyseal fracture shaft humerus were included between February 2016 and January 2019 at a tertiary care center. Patients with compound fractures, neurovascular injury, ipsilateral limb injuries, were excluded from the study. The patients were block randomized into group I (anterior bride plating) and group II (posterior plating).
Results: The mean age of the patients was 48.16 ± 8.66 in group I and 45.10 ± 9.56 years in group II respectively. AO-OTA type 12A was most commonly seen fracture type. The mean surgical time in group I was 55.80 ± 6.23 minutes while it was 85.31 ± 7.67 minutes in group II was significant (p<0.001). Patients in group I had shorter hospital stay (p=0.018). Group I has a mean union rate of 14.57 ± 1.72 while group II had a rate of 15.67 ± 2.41 weeks (p=0.046). One patient in each group had non-union. One patient in group I had lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury with some residual sensory loss. There was a significant improvement in DASH scores in both groups (p=0.0043).
Conclusion: The anterior bridge plating is a reliable and reproducible technique with shorter operative time, hospital stay, early radiological union and better outcome as compared to traditional posterior compression plating.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma Surgery and Related Research received 281 citations as per Google Scholar report